The claim contains a meaningful point, but leaves out important context.
Did Rob Sand uncover a record amount of misspent money?
Sand says he uncovered more waste, fraud and abuse during his first term than any Iowa state auditor had uncovered in a single term.
There is no question that Sand's office reported millions of dollars in improper or unsupported spending. One major finding involved $21 million in federal pandemic money that the state subsequently returned to the proper fund.
The harder part is the word “record.” Sand's campaign does not publish a complete calculation, identify which findings it counts or provide comparable totals for every previous auditor's term. Iowa's older reports also do not consistently use the same definitions.
Bottom line: The record supports Sand's broader claim that his office identified millions in misspent or improperly used money. Iowa First Check could not independently verify that his first-term total was the largest in state history using a consistent comparison.
The complete record
The claim: Sand's campaign has said he uncovered more waste, fraud and abuse during his first term as Iowa state auditor than any auditor before him found in a single term.
Made by: Rob Sand
What is documented:
- Sand's office reported millions of dollars in improper, unsupported or misspent funds across multiple audits and special investigations during his first term.
- One widely cited finding involved about $21 million in federal pandemic relief money that Sand's office found had been misallocated; the funds were subsequently returned to the correct account.
- Sand's campaign cites the cumulative total of these findings as evidence of a “record” amount of misspent money uncovered.
What is not established: Sand's campaign has not published a complete, itemized calculation showing which specific findings are included in its total, or a comparable total for every previous Iowa state auditor's term using consistent definitions of “waste, fraud and abuse.” Older state audit reports do not consistently categorize findings the same way, making a direct historical comparison difficult to verify independently.
Public response: Sand's campaign points to the cumulative dollar figures from his office's audits and investigations as support for the claim, and says the pandemic-relief finding and other investigations demonstrate an unusually active enforcement record.
Sources: